Estimated annual losses from fake follower fraud in Indian influencer marketing — money that brands pay for audiences that don't exist
The Scale of Influencer Fraud in India
India's influencer marketing industry crossed ₹3,500 crore in 2024, but an estimated ₹1,200 crore of that goes to waste on creators with artificially inflated audiences. The problem isn't a few bad actors — it's systemic. An estimated 30-40% of Indian influencer accounts have some degree of artificial inflation, from purchased followers to engagement pods to bot-driven interactions.
After managing 2080+ campaigns, we've developed a rigorous vetting framework that catches fraudulent metrics before they cost brands money. The methods for inflating numbers have grown sophisticated, but the patterns of fraud remain detectable if you know what to look for.
This guide gives you the exact framework our team uses to vet every creator before recommending them for brand campaigns. No paid tools required — every method here uses free tools and manual checks that any brand can implement immediately.
The Six Types of Influencer Fraud in India
Type 1: Purchased Followers
The most basic form of fraud — buying followers from services that sell bot accounts or incentivized follow-backs. Purchased followers are typically inactive accounts, accounts from non-relevant geographies (mass following from Turkey, Brazil, or Indonesia is a common pattern for Indian accounts), or accounts that follow thousands of people but post nothing. The cost of purchasing followers has dropped to ₹50-200 per 1,000 followers, making it temptingly cheap for aspiring creators.
Type 2: Engagement Pods
Groups of 20-100 creators who agree to like and comment on each other's posts within minutes of publishing. This creates the appearance of high engagement but the interactions come from fellow creators, not from genuine audience members. Pod-driven engagement is harder to detect because the accounts are real — but the engagement is coordinated rather than organic. Look for the same 15-20 accounts consistently commenting on every post within the first 30 minutes.
Type 3: Bot Engagement
Automated services that generate likes, comments, and views from bot accounts. Comments are typically generic ("Amazing!" "Love this!" "🔥🔥🔥" "Beautiful shot!") and never reference the specific content of the post. Bot engagement creates volume without depth — hundreds of likes but zero saves, zero shares, and zero genuine conversations in the comments.
Type 4: Follow/Unfollow Schemes
Creators who follow 200-500 accounts daily, wait for follow-backs, then unfollow them. Over months, this builds follower counts without ever purchasing a single bot. The telltale sign is a following-to-follower ratio that's extremely low (following 500 but having 100K followers) combined with abnormally low engagement rates, because most of these followers never actively chose to follow the account.
Type 5: Paid Promotion Misrepresentation
Creators who consistently run paid promotion (Instagram ads) on their posts to inflate view and reach numbers, then present these boosted metrics as organic performance to brands. A Reel that "got 500K views" might have 450K views from ₹5,000 worth of paid promotion — making the creator appear far more influential than their organic reach actually is.
Type 6: Comment Buying
A newer and more sophisticated fraud where creators purchase custom comments that reference the actual content of the post, making them harder to distinguish from genuine engagement. These services employ real people (often in other countries) to write contextual comments. Detection requires checking commenter profiles for patterns of commenting on unrelated influencer posts across categories.
The Free Vetting Framework: 7 Checks Every Brand Should Run
Check 1: Follower Growth Pattern (Social Blade)
Visit socialblade.com and enter the creator's Instagram handle. Organic growth looks gradual and consistent — a steady upward curve with occasional small spikes from viral content. Fake follower purchases create sudden, dramatic spikes (gaining 10,000-50,000 followers in a single day) followed by plateaus or slight declines as Instagram purges bot accounts. Red flag: any single-day gain exceeding 5% of total followers without a corresponding viral post or media appearance.
Check 2: Engagement Rate Calculation
Calculate manually: (Average likes + comments on last 10 posts) / Total followers × 100. Compare against benchmarks:
| Follower Count | Healthy Engagement Rate | Suspicious (Below) | Likely Inflated (Below) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1K-10K | 5-12% | 3% | 1.5% |
| 10K-50K | 3-8% | 2% | 1% |
| 50K-100K | 2-5% | 1.5% | 0.8% |
| 100K-500K | 1.5-3% | 1% | 0.5% |
| 500K+ | 1-2.5% | 0.8% | 0.3% |
An account with 200K followers and 0.4% engagement is almost certainly carrying significant fake followers. The engagement rate should be calculated across a minimum of 10 recent posts (excluding Reels, which naturally get higher reach) to get an accurate picture.
Check 3: Comment Quality Audit
Manually read the first 20-30 comments on 5 recent posts. Genuine comments reference specific content in the post — "I visited this exact café last month!" or "How long did you process this edit?" or "This comparison really helps, I was deciding between these two." Fraudulent comments are generic and interchangeable — "Nice!" "Amazing!" "🔥" "Beautiful!" "Love it!" — they could apply to any post on any account. If more than 60% of comments are generic single-word or emoji-only responses, the engagement is likely artificial.
Check 4: Audience Geography Check
Request the creator's Instagram Insights screenshot showing audience countries and cities. For an Indian creator targeting Indian audiences, at minimum 70-80% of followers should be from India. If you see significant percentages from countries like Turkey, Brazil, Indonesia, or Bangladesh, these are likely purchased followers. Also check the city distribution — does it match the creator's content focus? A Mumbai food blogger with 40% of their audience in Delhi and 20% in Hyderabad is normal. The same blogger with 30% from Istanbul and 15% from Jakarta is not.
Check 5: Follower Profile Sampling
Randomly click on 20-30 of the creator's followers and check their profiles. Real followers have: profile pictures, bio information, their own posts (at least a few), and a reasonable following-to-follower ratio. Bot or fake accounts typically have: no profile picture (or a stock photo), no bio, zero or very few posts, following thousands of accounts but having almost no followers. If more than 25-30% of sampled followers show these patterns, the account is inflated.
Check 6: Reel Views vs. Follower Ratio
Instagram's algorithm distributes Reels to audiences beyond the creator's followers, but there's still a correlation. Check the creator's last 10 Reels. Healthy pattern: Reel views range from 0.5x to 5x the follower count, with some natural variance. Suspicious pattern: Reel views are consistently below 10% of the follower count (suggesting most followers are inactive bots) or consistently 50x+ the follower count (suggesting paid promotion on every Reel to inflate views).
Check 7: Cross-Platform Consistency
Check the creator's presence across Instagram, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Genuine creators typically have proportional followings across platforms (maybe 100K on Instagram, 30K on YouTube, 10K on Twitter). Fraudulent creators often have massive Instagram followings but negligible presence elsewhere — because Instagram followers are the cheapest and easiest to fake. Cross-platform inconsistency is a strong signal that the primary platform's numbers are inflated.
⚠️ The Sophistication Problem
Fraud techniques are evolving. Slow-drip follower purchases (100-200/day instead of bulk purchases), AI-generated comments, and engagement services using real accounts make detection harder every year. No single check catches everything — run all seven checks together for a comprehensive assessment. When in doubt, ask the creator for Instagram Insights screenshots showing reach, impressions, and audience demographics for their last 5 posts. Genuine creators share this data readily. Fraudulent creators deflect, delay, or provide screenshots that look altered.
Free Tools for Influencer Vetting
| Tool | What It Checks | Cost | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social Blade | Follower growth patterns, engagement trends | Free | High for growth pattern analysis |
| HypeAuditor (free tier) | Audience quality score, engagement analysis | Free (limited) | Medium — good directional indicator |
| NotJustAnalytics | Instagram analytics, engagement rate | Free | Medium |
| Instagram Insights (request) | Direct platform data from creator | Free | Highest — this is primary source data |
| Manual Comment Audit | Comment quality and authenticity | Free (time cost) | High — most reliable detection method |
Red Flags Checklist: Quick-Scan Before Partnering
Immediate red flags (any one is grounds for deeper investigation):
→ Engagement rate below 1% for accounts under 100K followers
→ Sudden follower spikes visible on Social Blade with no corresponding viral content
→ More than 50% generic/emoji-only comments
→ Significant follower percentage from non-target countries
→ Creator refuses or delays sharing Instagram Insights
→ Massive Instagram following with negligible YouTube/Twitter presence
→ Comments appear within seconds of posting (bot timing pattern)
→ Same commenters appear on every single post (engagement pod pattern)
→ Following-to-follower ratio suggests follow/unfollow scheme
How Exif Media Vets Every Creator
Our vetting process goes beyond these public checks. For every creator we recommend for brand campaigns, we run a multi-stage verification that includes all seven checks above plus historical content performance analysis, brand safety screening, audience overlap analysis with the target brand's customer profile, and references from previous brand partnerships. This multi-layer vetting is why our campaign performance consistently exceeds industry benchmarks — you're paying for real audiences, not phantom numbers.
We reject approximately 35-40% of creators who approach us for our network based on data quality concerns. This might seem strict, but it protects our brand partners from wasting budgets and protects our reputation for delivering genuine results.
Frequently Asked Questions
Industry estimates suggest 30-40% of Indian influencer accounts have some degree of artificial inflation. This doesn't mean all are entirely fake — many legitimate creators have purchased small quantities at some point. The key is assessing the current state of their audience through engagement quality, growth patterns, and audience demographics rather than relying on follower count alone.
Instagram periodically purges bot accounts, which is why you sometimes see creators lose thousands of followers overnight. However, Instagram's detection lags behind fraud sophistication. More advanced services use accounts that mimic human behaviour patterns, making them harder for automated detection. Manual vetting remains necessary for any brand investing significant budgets.
For Indian creators: minimum 3% for accounts under 50K followers, minimum 2% for 50K-200K, and minimum 1.5% for 200K+. These are floors, not targets — the best creators significantly exceed these numbers. Engagement rate should be calculated across at least 10 recent posts, excluding any that were clearly boosted with paid promotion.
Not necessarily. Many now-legitimate creators purchased followers early in their journey before understanding the consequences. What matters is their current audience quality. If their recent engagement rates are healthy, comment quality is genuine, and growth patterns are organic for the past 6-12 months, a historic follower purchase shouldn't be disqualifying. Focus on present-day metrics.
Related Reading
Stop Paying for Phantom Audiences
Every creator in our 120+ network passes our rigorous multi-stage vetting process. No bots. No inflated numbers. Just real creators with real audiences who deliver real results.
Get Started